Repository navigation
docs: record that v0.1.0 is published and pinnable - #156
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Closes #133
v0.1.0is published and carriescanton-token-forge-0.0.1.dar, so the two sentences inSPEC.mdsaying this project has no downstream users are no longer true. This is the last acceptance criterion on #133, deliberately held until after the tag existed: making the edit earlier would have merged a false claim.Changes
SPEC.md### Size and statusand the section 12**Pre-release.**bullet: the package version stays0.0.1, and the build is now described as published atv0.1.0for downstream repositories to pin, with the tag's decoupling from the package version stated rather than left to be inferred from two different numbers side by side. "No migration story" and "no compatibility guarantees" both still hold and are kept.No other file changes, and no behaviour changes.
Acceptance criteria
v0.1.0carrying the DAR, package version still0.0.12c12669, where both checks are greenv0.1.0-rc1whose asset was downloaded and compiled against, then both the rc release and its tag deletedSPEC.mdno longer says there are no downstream usersTest plan
Automated tests
None added: a prose-only change to a document no suite reads. The release path itself ran green three times (dispatch 33446018447, rc 33506656591, tag 33508259874).
Manual verification
147835e775e523f78c784996c43500c57e1ed97bcab97c97df6515b65f9332da, identical to the release body and to the reproducibility print of both the dispatched and the tag run: three independent builds, same bytesmaindoes not reach,release-notes.sh's tag guard withALLOW_UNTAGGEDempty, and the publishconsumer-smoke, the first time anything compiled against the uploaded bytes rather than.daml/distgit ls-remote --tagsreturnsrefs/tags/v0.1.0alone, so the rc tag is goneBreaking changes
None.
Checklist
Screenshots
None.