Skip to content

Russh: Configured server auth-attempt cap is not enforced in the USERAUTH_REQUEST runtime path

Low severity GitHub Reviewed Published Aug 11, 2026 in Eugeny/russh • Updated Sep 30, 2026

Package

cargo russh (Rust)

Affected versions

<= 0.62.5

Patched versions

0.62.6

Description

Details

Affected versions and vulnerable location

  • Confirmed present on default branch main at HEAD 0089c89c94753bebbec12b956c07a1cd38740379.
  • Crate version at HEAD: 0.62.4.
  • Vulnerable locations on current default branch:
    • russh/src/server/mod.rs:91 (pub max_auth_attempts: usize)
    • russh/src/server/mod.rs:121 (default max_auth_attempts: 10)
    • russh/src/server/encrypted.rs:89 (USERAUTH_REQUEST dispatch into auth handler path)
    • russh/src/server/encrypted.rs:98 (self.common.auth_attempts += 1)
    • russh/src/server/encrypted.rs:53 (only runtime read of auth_attempts, used for initial reject timing, not attempt limiting)
  • Default-branch history check did not show a newer merged commit adding enforcement against config.max_auth_attempts.

Reachability trace verified

  1. Entry point: exported server API server::run_stream in russh/src/server/mod.rs:1049.
  2. Session run loop in russh/src/server/session.rs processes incoming packets and calls reply(...) (server/session.rs:725).
  3. reply forwards encrypted packets to session.server_read_encrypted(...) (server/mod.rs:1221).
  4. server_read_encrypted routes USERAUTH_REQUEST to enc.server_read_auth_request(...) (server/encrypted.rs:89).
  5. On each request, self.common.auth_attempts += 1 executes (server/encrypted.rs:98).
  6. No comparison against self.common.config.max_auth_attempts is present in this runtime flow.

PoC

Reproduction steps and observed output

I did not run a full server process in this environment because Rust tooling is unavailable. I verified the issue from source and command output on the audited tree.

  1. Show where max_auth_attempts appears:
rtk rg -n "max_auth_attempts" .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/encrypted.rs .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/session.rs

Observed:

.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs:91:    pub max_auth_attempts: usize,
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs:121:            max_auth_attempts: 10,
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs:148:            .field("max_auth_attempts", &self.max_auth_attempts)
  1. Show runtime auth-attempt handling:
rtk rg -n "auth_attempts == 0|auth_attempts \\+= 1" .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/encrypted.rs

Observed:

53:        let initial_none_rejection_wait_until = if self.common.auth_attempts == 0 {
98:                self.common.auth_attempts += 1;
  1. Show production entrypoint-to-auth path references:
rtk rg -n "pub async fn run_stream|match reply\\(|server_read_encrypted\\(|server_read_auth_request\\(" .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/session.rs .scratch/russh/russh/src/server/encrypted.rs

Observed:

.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/encrypted.rs:89:                enc.server_read_auth_request(
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/session.rs:725:                            match reply(&mut self, &mut handler, &mut pkt).await {
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs:1049:pub async fn run_stream<H, R>(
.scratch/russh/russh/src/server/mod.rs:1221:    session.server_read_encrypted(handler, pkt).await
  1. Toolchain check:
cargo --version

Observed:

/bin/bash: line 1: cargo: command not found

Impact

Attacker model

  • Attacker: unauthenticated remote client with TCP reachability to a russh-backed SSH service.
  • Preconditions: deployer expects server::Config.max_auth_attempts to cap attempts.
  • Impact: repeated USERAUTH_REQUEST attempts continue for a single connection beyond configured limit, increasing online guessing opportunity and backend auth workload.

Suggested fix

Enforce max_auth_attempts in the USERAUTH_REQUEST branch before invoking auth-method handlers, and fail closed once threshold is reached.

Concrete patch direction in russh/src/server/encrypted.rs:

if self.common.config.max_auth_attempts > 0
    && self.common.auth_attempts >= self.common.config.max_auth_attempts
{
    self.common.disconnect(
        Disconnect::NoMoreAuthMethodsAvailable,
        "Too many authentication attempts",
        "",
    )?;
    return Ok(());
}

How it was found and a note on tooling

The researcher synthesized three lens outputs, then revalidated each claim against current main: source presence and commit history, advisory overlap checks in both GitHub advisories and OSV, entrypoint-to-sink reachability, attacker-model realism, and execution-claim integrity. The researcher used gh, git, rg, and direct source inspection under .scratch/russh. Because Rust tooling is unavailable in this worker, this report is intentionally marked source-only.

AI assistance was used while investigating this and while drafting this report. The finding was verified by reading the cited code at HEAD. The vulnerability was not executed it, and that limit is stated plainly above rather than left implied.

Credits: arpitjain099.

References

@Eugeny Eugeny published to Eugeny/russh Aug 11, 2026
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Sep 29, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Sep 30, 2026
Reviewed Sep 30, 2026
Last updated Sep 30, 2026

Severity

Low

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(19th percentile)

Weaknesses

Improper Restriction of Excessive Authentication Attempts

The product does not implement sufficient measures to prevent multiple failed authentication attempts within a short time frame. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-102825

GHSA ID

GHSA-g6xm-f9xp-qq35

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.