Skip to content

docs: draft Gloas block event extension - #14

Merged
krisoshea-eth merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
krisoshea/lod-48-spec-01-beacon-api-block-event-extension
Aug 14, 2026
Merged

krisoshea-eth merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
krisoshea/lod-48-spec-01-beacon-api-block-event-extension

Conversation

@krisoshea-eth

@krisoshea-eth krisoshea-eth commented Aug 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What

  • Add a working design draft for extending the Beacon API block event from Gloas onward with builder_index and block_hash.
  • Record the current API-02 evidence, exact fork and self-build contract, mixed-client fallback behavior, versioning rationale, alternatives, and completion gates.
  • Add a source-level feasibility audit for Lodestar, Lighthouse, Nimbus, Prysm, Teku, and Grandine.
  • Define a concrete cross-client outreach sequence and track current overlap with Beacon APIs PRs #585 and #490.
  • Link the draft from the repository README and source map.

Why

Beacon APIs issue #599 identifies that the existing block event does not expose enough information for a Builder to cheaply determine whether its bid was selected. The current Lodestar Builder implementation uses block plus getBlockV2 as a compatible fallback. This draft provides a place to refine the proposed additive event extension before opening a Beacon APIs specification PR.

Research basis

  • Beacon APIs master at ba859dbca9076ba19dedc095c59afa7b05a66819.
  • Gloas consensus self-build and ExecutionPayloadBid semantics.
  • Recent Beacon APIs event precedents in #587, #590, and #621.
  • Current event construction paths in the six client repositories named above.
  • Current Lodestar Builder PRs and the Builder implementation plan and Living Technical Note.
  • Linear LOD-48 and its synchronized GitHub issue #49.

Status

This is a non-normative working draft. It does not represent an accepted Beacon API change. Nico supports the proposed direction, but Lodestar PoC evidence and cross-client review are still pending. The document now separates the threshold for opening an upstream draft from the evidence required before that PR can leave draft.

Tracking

Validation

  • Manual Markdown and link review
  • git diff --check
  • Verified that the Linear tracker and GitHub issue mirror carry the corrected #599 links and current audit tasks

AI assistance was used during codebase research, drafting, and review. The submitted documentation and pull request text were reviewed and revised by the author, including manual edits.

@linear-code

linear-code Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

LOD-48

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 13, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Draft detected.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: b65de451-b3d2-49d6-baef-d6c232285253

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • 🔍 Trigger review

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@krisoshea-eth
krisoshea-eth marked this pull request as ready for review August 14, 2026 15:27
@krisoshea-eth
krisoshea-eth merged commit 3d8ec24 into main Aug 14, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant